Volume VI No. 4

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

Exhibs Now Build to Most Restrictive Requirements
ADA: NATO Works To
Simplify Compliance

by Steven John Fellman
NATO Washington Counsel

Today, most building codes include requirements that public facilities such as theatres be fully accessible to persons with disabilities. However, your local building inspector may have a difficult time determining exactly what regulations apply to your new theatre.

At the outset, your state, county or city will have its own building code. In recent years code officials have attempted to unify various building codes into the International Building Code. The IBC is the uniform code that is being followed by most jurisdictions. However, many jurisdictions have not adopted the entire IBC. So the first question a theatre architect has to answer is: “What is in the local building code?”

With regard to disability access, the question is even more confusing. The disability access portions of the IBC are based on the American National Standards Institute 117.1 standard.

The ANSI standard is revised generally on 3-year cycles. Often it takes the IBC some time to update its code provisions to meet current ANSI requirements. However, some local codes refer directly to ANSI. These code requirements may change when the ANSI standards change.

There are two more complicating factors. The Access Board is the federal agency responsible for publishing guidelines the Department of Justice must use as a minimum in writing the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations that require theatre owner complaince. These guidelines are known as the “ADA Accessibility Guidelines” (ADAAG).

The Access Board revised its guidelines several years ago, but the Department of Justice has not revised its regulations. It has, however, proposed new regulations.

As a result, your architect must not only look at the local building code, ANSI Standard 117.1, but he or she must also look at the ADAAG, the current Justice regulations and the proposed Justice regulations.

What if some of these codes, standards and regulations have conflicting provisions?

Now you see the problem! In fact, there are not only direct conflicts between some of the accessibility requirements of IBC, ANSI, the ADAAG, the existing Justice regulations and the proposed Justice regulations, but some requirements are included in one document and not included in the others.

What can your architect do? He or she can make an informal “guess” of what is required or you may be told to build to the most restrictive requirements, which will substantially increase your costs of construction.
Representatives of IBC, ANSI and the Access Board recently met to see if it would be possible to unify the provisions of the IBC, ANSI and the ADAAG. NATO was invited to join in this effort and is actively participating in this process.

NATO is a member of the task force assigned to unify the regulations involving assembly areas. The initial responsibility of the task force is to study a side-by-side comparison of the IBC, the ADAAG and the ANSI standard and recommend the most effective means of establishing unified requirements.

The initial meetings of the “Assembly Task Force” have been productive and we are hopeful that the results of these efforts will provide uniformity in disability access requirements, which will benefit disabled persons, theatre owners and code officials. By working closely with representatives of ANSI, the IBC and the Access Board, NATO ensures full consideration in these important discussions.  

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents