Volume V No. 10

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

Those Adding Surcharges Must Maintain Evidence
High Cost Of Energy Leads
To Class Action Litigation

by Steven John Fellman
NATO Washington Counsel

In many consumer industries – including the airline, hotel, cruise ship and motor carrier industries – the dramatic increases in oil prices have precipitated major financial crises. Escalating energy costs across the board have eliminated profits for many companies and caused substantial losses for others. In an effort to mitigate some of these losses, several industries have begun to add charges labeled “energy surcharge,” “gasoline surcharge,” “environmental surcharge,” etc. to customer invoices. These charges add up to a few dollars per invoice and most purchasers pay these charges without objection.

The typical consumer has to fuel at least one automobile and recognizes that energy costs have skyrocketed. Consumers are willing to accept the premise that it is only fair for businesses caught in the energy crunch to have the ability to pass on some of these costs to customers.

As an example, if you rent a car or buy an airline ticket and find that there is a $2 or $4 fuel surcharge, most people do not question the surcharge or ask how the amount of the charge was determined. However, in a series of industries across the country, plaintiffs’ class-action attorneys have challenged companies that have implemented such charges. They have filed lawsuits alleging that the companies that place such charges on their invoices are representing to their customers that the amount of the charge is in some way related to the actual increased expenses that the company has incurred because of higher fuel costs.

In these class-action cases, it has been alleged that the amount of the surcharge on the invoice is in fact significantly higher than the actual cost of the increased fuel charge. In certain cases it is claimed that the defendants are trying to collect more than twice the amount of their increased costs. If this is so, the company implementing the surcharge is deceiving the consumer in violation of state statutes, which prohibit unfair and deceptive business practices. Class-action attorneys prosecuting these matters have recovered huge damages on behalf of large classes of plaintiffs.

What does this mean for theatre owners? If surcharges are represented to consumers as a direct pass-through of increased operating costs, the company utilizing the charge must be prepared to provide evidence that the amount of the charge actually reflects the amount of the increased expense. Class-action litigation is continuing to expand across the country and business must be prepared to defend itself against an aggressive plaintiff’s bar that has been extremely successful in presenting these class action cases.  

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents