Volume V No. 4

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

Developers
Multiplexes

Retail developments, especially the trendy outdoor ‘lifestyle centers,’ are eagerly courting multiplexes, craving perhaps more than ever the cinema’s drawing power.

by Ryan Stern

Increasingly, cinemas seem to be nesting in retail centers. And there’s a reason.

Multiplex chains are routinely benefiting from advantageous deals with retail developers – developers hungry for the flood of consumer traffic today’s multis so often attract.

At the same time, cinemas are obviously not in every mini-mall nor adjacent to every supermarket, creating perhaps something of a renter’s market.

Essentially, it comes down to the numbers. According to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), there are about 48,000 U.S. shopping center sites, while NATO data suggests there are only 6,000 U.S. cinema sites. There simply aren’t enough multis to go around.

Shopping Center Terminology
Type of Center
Square Feet*
Description
Neighborhood Center 30,000-150,000 Convenience center.
Community Center 100,000-350,000 General merchandise; community center.
Regional Center 400,000-800,000 General merchandise; fashion mall; typically enclosed.
Super-regional Center 800,000+ Similar to regional with more variety.
Fashion/Specialty Center 80,000-250,000 Higher-end merchandise; fashion oriented.
Lifestyle Center 150,000-500,000 Upscale national specialty stores; dining & entertainment in outdoor setting.
Power Center 250,000-600,000 Category-dominant anchors; few small tenants.
Theme/Festival Center 80,000-50,000 Restaurants; entertainment.
Outlet Center 50,000-400,000 Manufacturers' outlet stores.
*Includes anchor tenant space.    

The trick, experts agree, is to find a retail site in an area underserved by existing cinemas. “Forcing a theatre into a geographic area which already is adequately screened, even when a developer is willing to build turnkey for the exhibitor, only exacerbates the problem of screen saturation and revenue dilution,” explains Regal Entertainment Group exec John Roper.

“The only reason I think you shouldn’t do a cinema, even if you’ve got room in your project,” says Ken Wong, CEO of retail development giant Westfield Corp., “is if you’re splitting a film zone and creating a ruinous market.”

A good market is hard to find. Despite booming box office (U.S. cinema admission growth has almost doubled U.S. population growth over the past quarter-century), the number of U.S. cinema sites has been shrinking dramatically, from 7,477 in 1999 to a mere 6,030 at the end of 2004.

The Traffic Report
This much seems certain: Cinemas lure customers to more than just movies, and retailers know it.

A 1998 study of cross-shopping traffic in retail centers with cinemas, commissioned by the International Association of Shopping Centers (ICSC), determined that one in five movie patrons had visited the center exclusively for the purpose of seeing a movie, making no other trips for shopping.

“This indicates,” concluded the report, “that theatres drew in potential shoppers who otherwise wouldn’t have been exposed to the center.”

Similar research by Westfield, the largest retail property group in the world (as ranked by equity market capitalization), also speaks to cinema magnetism. “We believe that [having] a cinema generates an additional two mall visits every quarter. That is, eight additional mall visits a year,” says Wong, noting that those visits could be for cinemagoing, dining or shopping.

“We are seeing a trend of more theatres serving as anchors of retail centers,” says Shari Redstone, president of exhibition giant National Amusements, “and attribute that trend to the successes we have seen thus far and what developers we have worked with have noticed as well.”

A growing percentage of Westfield developments will include cinemas, according to Wong. While the developer currently houses cinemas at only 24 of its 67 existing U.S. retail centers, it plans to anchor cinemas at more than half of its projects in development.

Other developers plan to increase their use of cinema tenants. “General Growth just bought Ralphs Properties,” says ICSC exec Malachy Kavanagh. “Ralphs malls traditionally didn’t have theatres in them, but one of General’s strategies is to go back to these malls and renovate them and incorporate theatres.”

“Cinemas are a great activity anchor, a great people generator, a great reason for coming, so we love them,” says Wong. “We’re doing as many as we possibly can.”

“Most [malls] would have a cinema, especially the new ones,” says Kavanagh. “I think you’re going to find that very few modern enclosed malls don’t have a cinema in them.”

“The real question is, ‘How do you provide a more compelling mix for the consumer?’” notes Wong. “We are big believers that the cinema experience as one anchor is a way to get people to come back for different reasons and to come back more often.”

The Lonely Stand-Alone
To judge by the news items in In Focus’ Dateline: Exhibition section, “stand-alone” cinemas are comparatively lonely in more ways than one. Of the 50 new cinema sites discussed in those pages over the past six months, only four are situated outside retail centers.

Keith Thompson, a former Regal Cinemas exec who now owns and oversees the 47-screen Phoenix Theatres circuit (expected to double its screen count before year’s end), points out that “of the 200 [theatres] I’ve built in my career, most of those are in a shopping center of one type or another. Very few would be free-standing.”

The reason so many cinemas are housed in retail centers has a lot to do with those deals retail centers often offer cinema operators. “The cinema generally has an ‘anchor’ kind of rent, which, yes, would be less than the average small specialty shop,” verifies Westfield’s Wong.

“Anchors are typically given some kind of subsidy,” confirms Thompson. The developer who grants it, Thompson says, “knows if he has a theatre he’ll get five restaurants and three other retailers that otherwise wouldn’t have considered the site. He looks at an overall blend of return and says, ‘OK, this is what I get with the theatre, and overall it’s better with the theatre even if I subsidize it.’”

By many accounts, restaurant tenants are particularly happy to be situated near a cinema. “Over one half (56 percent) of the movie patrons at multi-use centers and 33 percent at suburban malls were estimated to have made a food purchase during their visit,” said the ICSC report.

Losing The Roof
As more cinemas move into retail developments, the centers themselves are undergoing a rapid evolution. Increasingly, multiplexes are finding themselves situated into “lifestyle centers,” developer-speak for malls with roofless common areas.

Only 28 of these lifestyle centers opened between 1923 and 1996, according to ICSC. Between 1997 and 2003, developers launched at least 88.

This trend is important to cinema operators because, according to the ICSC statistics, lifestyle centers incorporate space for cinemas more often than traditional malls. Cinemas make up a collective 5 percent of mall tenant space, compared to a collective 8.4 percent of all lifestyle center tenant space.

Some major developers don’t build indoor malls anymore. Every single one of Westfield’s in-development retail centers will incorporate the company’s “Hy-style” concept, its own brand of lifestyle center design.

The Simon Property Group – one of the largest cinema landlords in the country with over 100 locations (and nearly 1,000 screens) – says all of its 15 to 20 in-development retail projects, all due to bow within the next five or six years, will be lifestyle centers.

“In the case of [lifestyle centers], cinemas are a very important component,” Simon exec Don Pollard told a Feb. 14 Urban Land Institute seminar audience. “There’s only room for one to two traditional department stores, and so the theatre becomes a bigger traffic generator.

“The concept goes back to Shopping Centers 101: Whatever you can do to be as many things to your consumer as possible, and bring them back for as many purposes, getting them to come back more frequently, you do. Movie theatres are a traffic generator for the lifestyle center because of how it creates a new community, this new ‘urbanism,’ so to speak.”

Thompson agrees that “cinemas can be more successful when you have a full complement of retail and dining – other establishments where they can cross-shop and browse – where people can feel like they’re part of a village … what they’re calling the ‘lifestyle center.’”

“It’s ELP, as in Entertainment Lifestyle Precinct,” says Wong. “It’s the whole idea of bringing entertainment, food, restaurants into a shopping center location – to extend the life of the operating day, to bring a new audience, and to bring your old audience back more and more.”

“What the lifestyle center is doing is fighting to get the consumer, the patron, out of his home,” says Trans-Lux Cinemas prexy Matt Brandt. “You’ve got your refrigerator; you’ve got microwavable popcorn; you’ve got the comforts of your home, DVDs, HBO and pay-per-view. So how do you get somebody out of their comfortable scenario? By making these destination spots, and sort of fighting the market to bring people back outside when it’s getting so easy to stay inside.”   

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents