Volume V No. 2

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

Exhibition Giant Agrees To Renovations
Cinemark and Justice Dept.
Settle Wheelchair Seating Case

by Steven John Fellman
NATO Washington Counsel

In a settlement of great importance to the entire motion picture theatre industry, it was announced that a consent order had been reached in the case of U.S. v. Cinemark pending in the United States District Court in Cleveland. This consent order is the culmination of years of litigation that started out at the district court level, went to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and was the subject of a petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court refused to hear the case and the court of appeals sent it back to the district court for trial. Prior to any trial, Cinemark USA and the Department of Justice (DOJ) entered into a consent order. The consent order resolved the issue of where wheelchairs should be located in existing Cinemark stadium-style theatres and in the circuit’s new builds.

The agreement identified 120 operational Cinemark stadium-style auditoria and nine Cinemark stadium-style cinemas in the design stage. Cinemark is required to make structural renovations in 32 auditoria, moving the wheelchair locations back one row in the stadium section of the auditorium. The remaining modifications require Cinemark to add companion seats, or provide requisite number of companion seats and provide the required horizontal wheelchair spacing. Cinemark has five years to make the renovations. The consent order provides that if Cinemark has difficulty in getting a construction permit or if getting the permit would require a loss of a 15 percent or greater number of seats than originally estimated, or would cost more than 15 percent in excess of what was originally estimated, Cinemark can renegotiate the deal for that particular theatre.

It is the DOJ’s position that with regard to existing theatres that feature stadium-style seating, wheelchair locations should be on a cross aisle and the cross aisle should be elevated over the row in front of the cross aisle in such a manner that the cross aisle constitutes a riser. The DOJ believes that the consent order is consistent with this position.

The consent order is significant in its description of what constitutes Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance for new construction. To some extent, the consent order tracks the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published earlier this fall by the DOJ. However, the consent order goes further and permits Cinemark to place wheelchair seating on a riser in the rear 60 percent of the seats of an auditorium. A riser is defined as an elevated platform at least six inches in height. The DOJ appears to have agreed that for new construction in auditoria of under 300 seats, wheelchair locations can be placed on a riser, which is not a majority height riser, in the rear 60 percent of the seats in the auditorium as long as the wheelchair locations have one-on-one companion seating, have an unobstructed view of the screen, and are integrated into the general seating footprint of the auditorium.

In new construction of auditoria of over 300 seats, two options are provided. Either the wheelchair spaces can all be placed in the rear 60 percent of the auditorium or one-half of the required wheelchair spaces can be placed in the rear 50 percent of the auditorium and the remainder of the required wheelchair spaces can be placed in the front half of the auditorium, but not the first row. In either case, the wheelchair locations must be on risers. If the auditorium has some seats on a sloped floor and some on risers, all the ADA required wheelchair spaces must be on risers.

Cinemark submitted prototype plans for future construction to the DOJ. The plans are included as exhibits to the consent order. In the consent order, the DOJ states that these plans conform to ADA requirements. There is strong language in the consent order, which limits the DOJ’s rights to assist private plaintiffs who believe that theatres covered by the consent order are not in compliance with the ADA. There is also a provision for Cinemark/DOJ mediation of future disputes. Cinemark has the right to submit future plans to the DOJ for approval. If the DOJ does not act on the plan within a certain time period, the plan will be considered to be approved.

Although the contents of the consent order regarding new construction are obviously of great significance, a major concern if not the major concern for most NATO members revolves about the requirements to make renovations in existing theatres. In this context, it is interesting to note that in those Cinemark theatres for which no renovations are required, some, but not all, theatres have wheelchair locations on risers.

The Cinemark consent order is some 60 pages in length and includes an additional 99 pages of exhibits. Many of the exhibits are drawings of seating plans and specifications for Cinemark theatres. Copies of the consent order and the exhibits are available by contacting NATO headquarters in Washington, D.C.  

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents