Volume III No. 6

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

Some Thoughts About
On-Screen Advertising

Whenever the nature of a business evolves, the changes engender public scrutiny. Changes in the movie theatre business produce particularly intense debate because we operate in a high-profile environment. The relatively recent advent of on-screen rolling-stock advertising for products and services other than future motion pictures has produced just such a debate. I consider this scrutiny healthy.

Some NATO members, believing that screen advertising has the potential to substantially increase revenues without losing customers, have aggressively implemented new advertising programs. Other NATO members, believing that screen advertising will hurt business in the long run, have maintained a policy against such advertising. This is the beauty of a competitive industry. These different philosophies produce different operating policies that in turn offer the patrons choices. Only long-term profitability analysis will tell us which path was better.

Exhibitors should monitor the facts closely as the debate progresses. There are roughly 35,000 movie screens in the United States. Approximately 24,000 of them now show ads. Screen advertising currently constitutes a $300 million business, and looks to grow another 30 percent in calendar year 2003.

This is the beauty of a competitive industry. These different philosophies produce different operating policies that in turn offer the patrons choices. Only long-term profitability analysis will tell us which path was better.

Why do advertisers consider movie screens an attractive medium? First, ads in the theatre seem to work better (from the advertiser’s perspective) than ads in the home, for the same reasons that movies work better in the theatre – big screens, great sound, captive audiences and no distractions. Recall levels for cinema advertising vastly exceed those for television commercials. The A.C. Nielsen company estimates that 80 percent of theatre patrons can remember the subject of an on-screen ad – roughly five times more than can recall television spots.

Yet the power of the medium also produces more intense customer reactions. Theatre patrons have created online petition drives to protest screen advertising, and some have called for boycotts – of the theatres that show ads as well as the companies who advertise their products in theatres. In a highly publicized – albeit frivolous – lawsuit, some patrons in Chicago sued two NATO members for running screen ads after advertised movie show times.

Do these protests represent widespread patron unrest, or simply a small vocal minority? And will patrons become more or less opposed to screen advertising with the passage of time? Exhibitors must watch closely as the answers to those questions evolve.

Currently, according to Arbitron, 66 pecent of theatre patrons “do not mind the advertising they put on before the movie starts.” Younger patrons accepted advertising at much higher rates than their older counterparts. Among teens, 76 percent don’t mind ads. But among those 55 years of age and older, only 59 percent don’t mind the advertising. For the pro-commercial exhibitors, this data suggests that a strong majority of patrons will accept the new phenomenon of screen advertising. For the anti-commercial exhibitors, this data also reflects that a substantial minority of patrons (roughly one third) does object.

For those exhibitors who chose to accept screen advertising, I have made three suggestions in the past: Keep the ads short, keep them few and keep them entertaining. Theatre patrons in Europe seem to tolerate cinema ads more easily than do Americans. In Germany, cinemas routinely run 20 minutes of commercials or more. I doubt Americans will react the same way Germans do, at least in the short term. Make certain the commercials Americans see in moviehouses are not the same ones they’ve already seen at home.

NATO will serve as a forum to discuss and debate the issues. Exhibitors will make their own decisions about their own operating philosophies. And in the end, as always, competition is healthy!

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents