Volume III No. 8

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

OK To Say ‘I Don’t Know’
Why Did You Testify About
A Gorilla In Your Office?

by Steven John Fellman
NATO Washington Counsel

Sooner or later, every corporate executive is going to be involved in litigation and will be required to give a deposition. Prior to the deposition, the executive’s attorney will explain the procedure that will be followed at the deposition. The executive will be told to tell the truth and to answer questions by stating “Yes,” “No” or “I don’t know.” Over the years, it has been my experience that a substantial number of corporate executives do not follow their attorney’s advice and often testify as to matters to which they really have no knowledge. The end result is that the litigation is lengthened and the result of the deposition is to confuse rather than simplify the issues involved.

As a fact witness in a deposition you should testify only to those things that you know. Either you know something or you don’t know something.

Let’s look at an example. Assume that you are called to give a deposition as a “fact” witness in a case. Your company is not a party to the litigation. However, your company has done business with the defendant and the plaintiff believes that you may know certain facts that would be helpful. The plaintiff is a movie theatre patron claiming that he became ill after eating popcorn purchased at the movie theatre. He claims that he became sick because the popcorn was popped in rancid oil. You are being called as a witness because the defendant theatre company’s oil supplier listed your company as another purchaser of its popcorn oil. Although you are responsible for purchasing the popcorn oil used by your chain, you are certainly not a toxicologist or a chemist. You go to a deposition and you are sworn to tell the truth. Here is how two different witnesses with the same basic knowledge might answer a series of questions.

Witness One: He who “guesses.”
Question 1: Are you familiar with popcorn oil sold by the ABC Company?
Answer 1: Yes.
Question 2: Are you aware that popcorn oil may become rancid?
Answer 2: I don’t know, but I guess it could become rancid.
Question 3: Is it possible that any oil that you purchased from ABC could have become rancid?
Answer 3: I don’t recall ever having seen rancid oil, but I guess it is possible.
Question 4: So it is your testimony that you understand that popcorn oil could become rancid and that it is possible that ABC once sold you rancid popcorn oil?
Answer 4: Yes, it’s possible.

In looking at the same set of questions, Witness Two answered as follows:
Question 1: Are you familiar with popcorn oil sold by the ABC Company?
Answer 1: Yes.
Question 2: Are you aware that popcorn oil may become rancid?
Answer 2: I don’t know.
Question 3: Is it possible that any oil that you purchased from ABC could have become rancid?
Answer 3: I don’t know. I have never seen any rancid oil from ABC.
Question 4: So is it your testimony that you understand that popcorn oil could become rancid or that it is possible that ABC once sold you rancid popcorn oil?
Answer 4: That is not my testimony. My testimony is that I don’t know if popcorn oil could become rancid and I have never seen rancid popcorn oil from ABC.

At the end of the discovery period, the defendant files a motion for summary judgment. The defendant is entitled to summary judgment if, when all the facts are viewed favorably to the plaintiff, the evidence does not support a cause of action against the defendant. In this case, the defendant would like to argue to the court that the plaintiff has shown no facts during the discovery process that would lead to a conclusion that ABC Company provided rancid oil to the plaintiff. In response to the Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiff’s counsel pulls out your deposition. Plaintiff’s counsel argues that in your deposition you stated that it was possible that your company was provided with rancid oil by the defendant and based on that testimony, it is certainly possible that the same rancid oil was supplied to the defendant.

You look over your deposition and you point out that you were just trying to be helpful. The question that you were asked was whether or not something was “possible” and in reality almost anything is “possible.”
However, as a fact witness in a deposition you should testify only to those things that you know. Either you know something or you don’t know something. If you don’t know, your testimony should be “I don’t know.” This gets us back to the title of this article. Is it possible that a gorilla could walk into your office within the next 10 minutes? If you answered “Yes,” please read this article again. If you answer, “I don’t know,” you are well on your way to being a good witness at your next deposition.

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents