Volume II Number 9

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

The Pre-show Conundrum

Our studio partners decide what movies to release. Working with producers and directors, they choose and make content. They create a marketing image. They pick a distribution strategy involving a series of release media and windows of time in between them. Exhibitors can decide to play the films released by the studios by negotiating licensing terms coordinated with the release schedule. Simply put, the studios control the films. The theatre owners exhibit them.

Conversely, exhibitors control their movie screens. Either through outright ownership, long-term leaseholds, or management agreements, theatre operators make the business decisions necessary to operate movie theatres. They must balance a list of potential revenues and expenses to produce, over time, a profitable enterprise.

Part of this balancing act involves the “pre-show,” that time in between feature film exhibitions. The length of the pre-show varies, as do the lengths of feature films and the number of possible showtimes each day. But let’s assume a 30-minute block of time between the end of one feature and the beginning of the next.

Over the course of the past few years, exhibitors and distributors have spent too much time
discussing, debating,
negotiating and
sometimes fighting over the pre-show.

During that block of time the exhibitor can exit moviegoers, clean the theatre, enter the next moviegoers, show slides, run rolling stock advertisements, run policy trailers, run public service announcements, run optional theatrical trailers, and then run trailers that come attached to the feature film. As a legal and business proposition, these decisions are made by the exhibitors. As a matter of reality, there isn’t time to do everything.

Over the course of the past few years, exhibitors and distributors have spent too much time discussing, debating, negotiating and sometimes fighting over the pre-show. From many exhibitors’ perspective, there are causes for concern. Lengthy demands have been made on the number and identity of theatrical trailers to be played above and beyond the attached trailers.

Pressure has been applied regarding public service messages that should be exhibited. Attempts have been made to prohibit or control screen advertising. And I’m sure our studio friends have a list of concerns from their perspective, too.

I sense a current of growing unrest, but I don’t have any definitive answers yet. I do know that we must work better together as partners. We must focus on the overall good of the industry. Perhaps we need to fully understand the legal concepts involved. Perhaps we simply need better mutual respect. NATO will continue to examine these issues. In the meantime, I invite an open dialogue on the subject with anyone willing to give me their thoughts.

 

 

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents