Volume IV No. 4

A publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Advertise in In Focus

©

The Incredible Shrinking
Release Window

Exhibition has enjoyed much success in recent years, with admissions in 2002 and 2003 higher than those in any other year since 1957. Though we got off to a slower start in 2004, strength of product for the rest of the year looks encouraging.

While the growth in admissions is certainly worthy of celebration, other ongoing trends cause us only concern. One of these is the dramatic recent reduction of the theatrical-to-video windows.

Consider the numbers. According to NATO’s comprehensive tracking of all titles released by the home video divisions of the nine largest studios, the video/DVD release window shrank more in the year 2003 than during any other year in the last decade. Below are the average video release windows by year.

More recently, several studios made distribution decisions on Oscar-nominated pictures that challenge the primacy of theatrical release to an even greater degree. Sony decided to release “Something’s Gotta Give” on video and DVD three months and 18 days after its theatrical break. Similarly, DreamWorks slated “House of Sand and Fog,” another nominated picture, for video/DVD release three months and 11 days after its theatrical opening.

This causes me concern for two reasons. First, these pictures were good enough to be nominated for Oscars. Second, the companies releasing these two pictures have the shortest average 2003 video windows. Though the industry average stood at four months and 23 days during last year, Sony’s average for all pictures came in at four months and seven days, and Dreamworks’ average was four months and one day. For purposes of comparison, the complete studio roster of averages for 2003 is set forth below.

These numbers strongly suggest that different studios maintain very different philosophies about release patterns. Exhibitors should understand these differences and take them into account in their own individual business relationships. As your trade association, our role on an issue like this is to track the records and give you the information.

We live in a free market, without a very heavy hand from our government. In some other countries, the government establishes release window parameters. In France, for example, the media chronology for video/DVD is set by law. Currently, that window is fixed at six months. In other countries overseas, the free market governs and many foreign exhibitors operate in the shadow of video/DVD windows much shorter than ours here in the United States. Indeed, one leading international distributor recently suggested a possible window overseas of 2.5 months (a suggestion that has prompted significant backlash from exhibitors overseas).

To be sure, some of our members have reminded me that theatrical runs are getting shorter and shorter each year and, thus, the shortened video/DVD windows may not be encroaching on theatrical box office as much as we might presume. Perhaps. But I have two concerns with that philosophy. First, two “wrongs” don’t make a “right.” Moreover, the squeezed schedule means that some of our members don’t get the pictures at all. Indeed, with the two nominated pictures referenced above, some of our smaller members had been promised subsequent runs only to lose out to the newly announced video/DVD release date.

I welcome the dialogue on this important issue, and encourage all exhibitors to at least arm yourself with the facts. Know your distributors and their records.

 

 

Current Issue Previous Issues Newswire Search  Table of Contents