<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Reel Blog &#187; New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natoonline.org/blog/tag/new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natoonline.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>N.Y. Times on the movie rating system</title>
		<link>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2010/01/22/n-y-times-on-the-movie-rating-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2010/01/22/n-y-times-on-the-movie-rating-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Corcoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Reel Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.O. Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natoonline.org/blog/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times' movie critic A.O. Scott gets the ratings system better than almost anyone in the media.


  Mr. Dick’s film, a critique of the ratings system in the name of artistic freedom, dwells on the commercially fraught boundary between the R and NC-17 ratings, which caused problems for the directors of films [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2010/01/22/n-y-times-on-the-movie-rating-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good times in bad times</title>
		<link>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2009/03/03/110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2009/03/03/110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Corcoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Reel Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie theaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natoonline.org/blog/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big media outlets are waking up to the phenomenal box office and admissions numbers being generated so far this year.

On Sunday, the New York Times weighed in with the news that movie theaters are a bargain:


Helping feed the surge is the mix of movies, which have been more audience-friendly in recent months as the studios [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.natoonline.org/blog/2009/03/03/110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

